Misinformation/Confusion During The CCP-Wuhan Covid-19 Pandemic was U.S. Government Policy
Universal Healthcare
May, 2026 - Here is an update to the article at the left posted in 2021. NIH did fund EcoHealth Alliance (Peter Daszak), which subcontracted gain-of-function research to Wuhan Labs. A 2018 EcoHealth report to NIH reportedly showed viral gain-of-function exceeding 10x; NIH allegedly took no action. Dr. Fauci publicly changed the definition of "gain-of-function" and denied the research before Congress. Social media platforms suppressed licensed physicians' posts about alternative treatments. COVID-19 vaccine side effects (myocarditis, pericarditis, anaphylaxis) were documented but allegedly under-reported. See details below.
2026 Updated Version - COVID-19 Origins: What Has Been Confirmed Since 2021 Official U.S. Government Position Has Shifted
In January 2025, the CIA released an assessment concluding that COVID-19 is "more likely" to have originated from a laboratory than from natural spillover. However, the agency expressed "low confidence" in the finding, noting it was based on a fresh look at existing data rather than new intelligence, according to Fortune Magazine.
In April 2025, the White House officially declared on its website that COVID-19 originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. PubMed Central
EcoHealth Alliance & Peter Daszak — Debarred
Following an eight-month investigation, HHS formally debarred both EcoHealth Alliance and Dr. Peter Daszak from participating in federal procurement and nonprocurement programs, with evidence revealing that they facilitated gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology without proper oversight and willfully violated multiple requirements tied to their multimillion-dollar NIH grant, according to Sharyl Attkisson.
The debarment is retroactive to May 2024 and lasts five years. EcoHealth Alliance also terminated Daszak's employment, according to The Daily Caller. Source: HHS letter released by the House Oversight Committee, January 18, 2025; Daily Caller; Sharyl Attkisson.
Congressional Findings on Fauci & NIH
The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic found that Dr. Fauci's senior advisor, Dr. David Morens, violated NIH policies and potentially broke federal law — including unlawfully deleting federal COVID-19 records and sharing non-public NIH grant information with EcoHealth Alliance's Peter Daszak. House Oversight Committee
Dr. Fauci continued to maintain his claim that the NIH never funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan, despite mounting contradictory evidence. House Oversight Committee. Source: U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, June 13, 2024. Dr. David Morens — Federally Indicted (April 2026)
On April 28, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice indicted Dr. David Morens, 78, a former senior NIAID advisor, on charges of conspiracy against the United States; destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations; concealment, removal, or mutilation of records; and aiding and abetting. Source: U.S. Department of Justice
The indictment alleges that Morens was part of "a scheme to evade Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests in connection with COVID-19 research grants" and that he faces up to 20 years per count of record falsification if convicted—source: Science.
The indictment refers to an unnamed "Senior NIAID Official 1," widely understood to be Dr. Fauci, with whom Morens allegedly "back-channeled" non-public NIH information. The HighWire. Sources: DOJ Office of Public Affairs; HHS Office of Inspector General; Science/AAAS; Newsweek; PBS NewsHour — all April 28–29, 2026
Note on Dr. Fauci: As of May 2026, Dr. Fauci himself has not been charged. The Morens indictment is the first significant criminal action against a public health official in connection with the origins of COVID-19 and the cover-up of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Source: The HighWire.
Vaccine Side Effects — What the Record Shows
The original text's concerns about under-reporting have received some subsequent documentation: Myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccination are now acknowledged by the CDC and documented in peer-reviewed literature, particularly in young males after the second dose. The FDA's VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database remains the primary tracking tool, though critics continue to argue that under-reporting is a structural problem.